翻訳と辞書 ・ Davis Tarwater
・ Davis Terrace, Washington
・ Davis Theater
・ Davis Totem
・ Davis Town Meeting House
・ Davis Township
・ Davis Township, Caldwell County, Missouri
・ Davis Township, Fountain County, Indiana
・ Davis Township, Indiana
・ Davis Township, Kittson County, Minnesota
・ Davis Township, Starke County, Indiana
・ Davis Tull
・ Davis Tutt
・ Davis v Alexander
・ Davis v. Ayala
・ Davis v. Bandemer
・ Davis v. Beason
・ Davis v. City of Las Vegas
・ Davis v. Commissioner
・ Davis v. Commissioner (constructive receipt)
・ Davis v. County School Board of Prince Edward County
・ Davis v. FEC
・ Davis v. Mann
・ Davis v. Massachusetts
・ Davis v. United States
・ Davis v. United States (1990)
・ Davis v. United States (1994)
・ Davis v. United States (2011)
・ Davis v. Washington
・ Davis Valley
|
|
| Davis v. Bandemer ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Davis v. Bandemer
''Davis v. Bandemer'', , is a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that claims of partisan gerrymandering were within the judiciary's remit, but failed to agree on a clear standard for the judicial review of the class of claims of a political nature to which such cases belong. The decision was later limited with respect to many of the elements directly involving issues of redistricting and political gerrymandering, but was somewhat broadened with respect to less significant ancillary procedural issues.
==Background==
Democrats in the state of Indiana challenged the state's 1981 state apportionment scheme for Indiana General Assembly districts because of political gerrymandering. The Democrats argued that "the apportionment unconstitutionally diluted their votes in important districts, violating their rights."〔(【引用サイトリンク】url=http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1985/1985_84_1244 )〕
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Davis v. Bandemer」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|